On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:47:06 -0000, "janzen257"
<yahoo.to.mj257@
>--- In OptionClub@yahoogro
>> [...]
>> Now contrast this situation will the rationale for making a
>> position delta neutral at other times. I see, in this and other
>> forums, diagonal traders explain how they sell just enough
>> ATM calls against their LEAPS to make the total position DN.
>> Of course the next day the market moves and they are no
>> longer DN. Why did they think that was the best move in their
>> quest to make money?
>
>Because they don't pretend to know which way the market will move the
>next day.
>
>The idea is that they want to eliminate, to the greatest extent
>possible, the risk caused by price movements. Instead, they want to
>sell premium, and to make money from time decay and/or changes in
>volatility.
>
Well if the market stays right where they sold the premium they will
benefit from the time decay. My point was that the gurus who shill
such trades don't maintain the delta neutrality as the market moves
daily so I don't see the point of the initial setup. Is there proof
that starting off delta neutral is better than selling as much premium
as margin will allow?
To unsubscribe from TheOptionClub, send an email to:
OptionClub-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
No comments:
Post a Comment