I mean no disrespect, but what is the point of the question?
It is much better to discuss the situation without numerical examples,
which distract from the obvious. Both a poker game and a particular
INDEX option issue have a definite start and end of their existence.
Thus the total credits and debits received by the participating
players during that time have to net out to zero. There are no
residuals in these forms of bartering so the analogy between the two,
in that superficial respect, is OK. Stock and futures options beget
residual short and long positions at the end of their lives so the
poker analogy is not as good here. Also buying and selling rare
coins, works of art and stocks during a fixed time period have
credits and debits net out to zero but the residual at the end of the
period would make a poker analogy at least as weak at it is for
options.
So just what is the point with the poker/options analogy? Will
options traders get better by reading books on poker?
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:58:51 -0500, "mcatolico"
<mcatolico@mindspring.com > wrote:
>No, pick any expiration price and the net result is the same. For every open
>long position there is an open short position (hence the term "open
>interest"). In an alternate example where mary's option goes to say $20 she
>makes $17 and the market maker loses $19 (the original open short position
>less the $20 expiration minus initial $1 credit). I still make $1 and jack
>still makes $1 thus 1+1+17=19.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: OptionClub@yahoogroups.com [mailto:OptionClub@yahoogroups.com ] On>Behalf Of Ricky Jimenez>Maybe you are saying that for a fixed particular underlying, strike,
>Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:45 PM
>To: OptionClub@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [TheOptionClub.com] Re: are options a zero sum game?
>
>put or call, and month, the total of the debits and credits for an
>option that expires unexercised are zero. Now take your example and
>assume that the option expires ITM. Then the transactions are the
>same but in that case, are you also insisting that Mary lost $3? She
>might have made a fortune.
>
>On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:57:13 -0500, "mcatolico"
><mcatolico@mindspring.com > wrote:
>
>>Ricky I don't know why you have a hard time with this. If I buy abcde 80
>>strike from a market maker for $1 as a new contract and sell it to jack for
>>$2 and he sells it to mary for $3 and it expires worthless, it all adds up
>>to zero net: market maker makes $1, I make a dollar, jack makes a dollar
>and
>>mary loses $3. That's zero sum. Show some other way for this to end that
>>doesn't wind up in net zero and I will give you the difference.
>>
To unsubscribe from TheOptionClub, send an email to:
OptionClub-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
No comments:
Post a Comment