The difference between options and poker is that there is a definite
beginning and end of a poker game and that beginning and end applies
to all players so it is easy to total the profits and loses for the
individual players at the end of the game and get zero. There might
be a precise analogy for options but I have never seen it written
down.
By the way Jack, you can exercise a call you own but you certainly
can't specify that the person who sold you the call is also the one
who sells you the stock.
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:28:10 -0500, "Jack" <jack@jackcpa.
>It's like a poker game. If you win, someone has to lose (and the house takes a cut).
>
>
>
>Look at an individual option. If I buy a call for $1, the seller gets $1 (plus/minus our commissions)
>
>
>
>From: OptionClub@yahoogro
>Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 1:49 PM
>To: OptionClub@yahoogro
>Subject: Re: [TheOptionClub.
>
>
>
>
>
>Options do seem like a very fuzzy-logic sort of situation. I really dont' know specifically what one means by the term "zero-sum game" ? I generally have an idea, but perhaps some one can give a clearer meaning. Ha. I'll just go to dictionary.com . Take care guys.
>
>
>Richard
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
>From: Ricky Jimenez <rickyjim@bestweb.
>To: OptionClub@yahoogro
>Sent: Mon, April 19, 2010 8:37:10 AM
>Subject: Re: [TheOptionClub.
>
>
>
>The trouble I have with this question is that I have never seen a
>precise specification of what the numbers are that have to add up to
>zero. And I have looked in books on mathematical finance for it.
>People who insist on the affirmative answer to the question say things
>like, "Look, I am a trader, not a mathematician and you know what I
>mean". :-)
>
>
>
>
To unsubscribe from TheOptionClub, send an email to:
OptionClub-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
No comments:
Post a Comment