Dom,
I agree with the gist of your post. I believe many people would simply close the whole position out if it goes south. In fact, that's what I tend to do. Earlier in my trading career, however, I didn't take defensive action and got into some real bad sitiations holding stocks that were underwater for too long. Hence, my interest in protective puts.
Michael
www.safe-options-
--- In ConservativeOptionS
>
> Michael - Interesting question. You are probably correct.  I think most people do not "collar" a position for several reasons:
> Â
> When you get into a covered call position, it is because you want income, and because you are neutral to positively biased towards that security. Collaring the position with a protective put means that you are now giving income away, and also that you have suddenly developed a bearish bias. In that case, why not just close the entire covered call position?
>
> Further, if you are interested in holding a stock long enough to qualify for the lower long term capital gains tax rate, a protective put will reset your calendar clock to zero in the eyes of the IRS, nullifying any time that you may have held the security thus far.
> Â
> In my mind it is much better to either close out the covered call position, or if you feel that the security will outperform the market on a relative basis, hedge your covered call positions with puts on a relevant market index.
> Â
> Regards,
> Â
> Dom Brunone
>
> --- On Mon, 2/8/10, optionsmike <michael@...
>
>
> From: optionsmike <michael@...
> Subject: [ConservativeOption
> To: ConservativeOptionS
> Date: Monday, February 8, 2010, 8:17 PM
>
>
> Â
>
>
>
> All,
> A question for the group. Does anyone in the group who uses covered calls ever collar the call with a protective put? My impression is that not too many people do.
>
> Michael
> www.safe-options- trading-income. com
>
Friday, February 12, 2010
[ConservativeOptionStrategies] Re: Covered calls with collars
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment