I've spent two days mulling over the diagonal LEAPS paper. Very interesting, and a good presentation of some material that is counter-intuitive for me.
I tend to trade vertical credit spreads and iron condors, usually single month durations, usually on stocks rather than indexes. I've been successful at it, but as you noted in a post, it can be time consuming, since dealing with individual stocks requires some diversification to stay out of trouble.
Since my retirement plan requires 1.25% / month, and I am shooting for 1.5% / month, I think the diagonal LEAPS makes a good conservative anchor for 1/3 to 1/2 of my capital. I can think of some minor modifications to be more investment oriented rather than income oriented, like legging into the LEAPS over time on market pull backs. Makes the accounting a little more difficult, but should make the whole thing a little more profitable.
No real question, just thanks for the clear explanation.
Monday, November 30, 2009
[ConservativeOptionStrategies] Dr. Joe - Thanks for the information
RE: [TheOptionClub.com] GOOG [was Re: Basic Calendar Question]
This is not a "strategy" per se. remember that all I'm trying to explain
here is what causes pinning behavior (and I probably should have changed the
subject header once again). In no way am I trying to recommend a way to
trade on expiration.
What I'm describing is what happens as a "natural" consequence of open
interest at a strike near expiration. If you are long or short that atm
strike from a PREVIOUS position, you will obviously have a keen interest in
what happens during the trading day on expiration Friday and thus be looking
for ways to trade your position to profitability. the long trader is
fighting decay while the short trader is hoping that the last drops of theta
- which are often significant - evaporate. The long trader will be looking
to scalp the remaining gamma while - ironically, I guess - the short trader
is the one feeling the "max pain" as the underlying moves AWAY from the
strike.
Any attempt to ENTER a position like this on expiration Friday requires a
real gambler's spirit along with the finesse (and favorable margin) needed
to play it skillfully. Entering a box or partial box on expiration will
surely be a highly expensive proposition for a retail trader. The bid/ask
spreads will be unforgiving and any chance you have of scalping a profit
will require that you have unbelievable timing and ability to pick
direction. and if you have such market ESP you may as well just play it with
the underlying since that would be much easier and cheaper to trade.
A couple other comments below...
-----Original Message-----
From: OptionClub@yahoogro
Behalf Of comedynight2000
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 2:57 AM
To: OptionClub@yahoogro
Subject: [TheOptionClub.
Dear Michael: thanks for this interesting post which contains an idea for
expiration trading that I had not considered before. Please allow me to
restate and expand.
On expiration Friday, you appear to be saying that it makes sense to put on
two legs of a conversion or reversal and either lock in the third leg at a
profit after a favorable or, at worst, hold through the end of the day and
exercise before 4pm Saturday. For example, you can buy the stock, and buy
the puts. (Especially helpful if you have a slight upside directional bias.)
If the stock declines, exercise the puts. However if the stock moves up
later in the day, thenn you may be able to sell the calls for a risk free
profit, having locked in the conversion. Is that basically right?
mc- no. what you're basically saying is just to buy calls and hope the
market goes up. again, this is pure short term speculation that if you are
good enough to predict accurately, I salute you.
If so, why not do this as a box since margin requirements would be so much
less? For example, start the position as a three legged box. With the
stock close to 580, say, buy the 570 580 vertical call debit spread plus the
600 put (to protect downside risk). If the stock goes lower, sell the 580
put to lock in the box at a profit. If the stock goes higher, sell the long
call at a profit and short the stock to lock in a reversal (although it's
not clear if this would be at prices better than the market originally
offered.
Mc -the bid/ask spreads on all these trades would probably wipe out any
chance of significant profit unless the underlying somehow sold off
enormously. The trade you are suggesting requires the 580 strike to have a
lot of premium left in it.
Perhaps a third trading strategy would be to buy at DITM gut strangle early
on Friday morning. Then you can sell the short ATM straddle legs against
the long DITM legs as the stock oscillates. Thanks very much, in advance,
for your comments....
Mc - like your previous example you would be generating a lot of premium for
the market makers. And you would likely be making the wrong trades in the
sequence. The premium is going to be the greatest on the straddle at or near
the open so if you are going to sell it, that's the time. That strangle is
meaningless except as disaster protection in the event that somehow during
the trading day the underlying flies outside the bounds of the strangle. In
effect you've described three incompatible trades or three trades that
benefit from dramatically different scenarios: 1) buy atm calls and hope the
stock goes higher to offset the premium paid for those calls (this is a
bullish bet on direction and or volatility), 2) buy an otm put and hope for
a big sell off (this is a bearish bet on an extreme directional move to the
downside), and 3) a short atm straddle (which is of course a bet on
volatility completely dying and the hope for an atm).
--- In OptionClub@yahoogro
>
> Comments below.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: OptionClub@yahoogro
> Behalf Of Jack
> Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 2:45 PM
> To: OptionClub@yahoogro
> Subject: RE: [TheOptionClub.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> OK, so you're long 100 calls and the underlying trades up to 80.25. Your
> calls will be worth .25+. Why not sell the calls instead of selling the
> stock?
>
>
>
> Mc -Because you get the same quarter lock PLUS 100 free puts by shorting
the
> stock against the calls. (for those that can't see this , a long call plus
> short stock is synthetically a long put. In the example if the stock
> continued higher the long call would gain in value equal to the loss in
> value of the short stock and at expiration the exercise of the long calls
> would negate the short stock. Conversely that long call plus short stock
> means that below 80 the calls are worthless but the short stock gains
value
> as the stock goes south. Thus, the synthetic equivalent of the long put.)
>
>
>
> If the stock drops to 79.75 and your calls expire worthless, you are short
> 10,000 shares. What if it gaps up Monday (pin risk - cost me $4,000 one
> expiration L )
>
>
>
> mc- you buy the stock back at 79.75 and lock in another quarter. If you
> don't buy it back for some reckless reason (why would you not buy back the
> short stock you sold for no risk at 80.25 with the stock now trading at
> 79.75?), you just exercise the long calls. There is absolutely no reason
to
> be exposed to pin risk unless you are stubborn enough not to buy back
shorts
> at expiration - or sell longs if you don't want to be exercised.
>
>
>
> OK, so it drops to 79.75 and you buy shares - where's your protection?
What
> if it continues to drop, 79.50, 79.25,..
>
>
>
> mc- you don't need protection since you've just closed all your risk: sold
> 10,000 at 80.25 and bought 10,000 at 79.75. (i.e. you've just locked in
> $5000).
>
>
>
> I can understand why stocks would close at the strike with the most
options
> - when they had automatic exercise if .25 ITM. What effect has the penny
> exercise rule had?
>
>
>
> mc- this is irrelevant. It's not the automatic exercise AFTER expiration
> that drives pin behavior. It's deltas PRIOR to expiration that
professionals
> (and smart amateurs) are capitalizing on.
>
>
>
> From: OptionClub@yahoogro
> Behalf Of mcatolico
> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 9:09 PM
> To: OptionClub@yahoogro
> Subject: RE: [TheOptionClub.
>
>
>
> For instance if I am long 100 80 strike calls on abcde stock and the
> underlying trades up to 80.25 with less than an hour or two to expiration,
I
> will sell 10000 shares against those calls to lock in the quarter premium.
I
> now synthetically own 100 long 80 puts. If my selling action (and if there
> are a lot of other open contracts at the 80 strike, the selling of many
> others) drives that stock back down to 79.75, guess what, I now buy 10000
> shares to scalp another quarter out of the market. Lather, rinse repeat,
as
> the pendulum wobbles back and forth and the scalps get tighter and tighter
> to the point where I'm scalping 10000 shares for a nickel or ultimately a
> penny.
>
------------
The goal of TheOptionClub is to provide a forum for members to work together
for the purpose of furthering our individual understanding option trading.
All messages and postings, and any materials circulated are provided for
discussion and educational purposes only. No statement contained in any
materials from TheOptionClub should be considered a recommendation to buy or
sell a security or to provide investment, legal or tax advice. All
investors are encouraged to consult a qualified professional before trading
in any security. Stock and option trading involves risk and is not suitable
for most people. There is no guarantee that any information provided is
accurate and, may in fact, be wrong. It is understood that the participants
in TheOptionClub have varying backgrounds and degrees of experience in
option trading, and that regardless of experience each member is considered
a student. As such, any information distributed through TheOptionClub
should be considered with a critical mind and not relied upon as an
authoritative source.
To unsubscribe from TheOptionClub, send an email to:
OptionClub-unsubscr
To unsubscribe from TheOptionClub, send an email to:
OptionClub-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
RE: [TheOptionClub.com] Market Wizards Example
'Or he would buy an ATM fly which captures time premium if the underlying does not move much. If it did move a lot he would lose on the front month but make a fortune on the back month position.'
I appreciate you taking the time to help. If possible, could you give me an example
of his front month and back month fly. I can't picture these two positions vividly.
To: OptionClub@yahoogro
From: comedynight2000@
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:04:38 -0800
Subject: Re: [TheOptionClub.
From: asdfffg1 <joshuas7@hotmail.
To: OptionClub@yahoogro
Sent: Sat, November 28, 2009 1:24:39 PM
Subject: [TheOptionClub.
In 'Market Wizard's', Tony Saliba describes a fly strategy, where he bought backmonth flys and would short frontmonth flys to scalp. Does anyone know if the front month fly sold is placed ATM ITM or OTM. If someone is familar with the details, I would very much appreciate some kind of visual, for this setup. Thanks for the help
Windows 7: It works the way you want. Learn more.
To unsubscribe from TheOptionClub, send an email to:
OptionClub-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
[ConservativeOptionStrategies] CC vs diagonal spread w/LEAPs - margin requirements?
I've read posts where people like the idea of buying a LEAP (instead of the underlying stock) as their protection when shorting a near-term call. The justification of this is usually that the LEAP ties up less capital.
But what about Portfolio Margin accounts? Is that still true?
The CBOE portfolio margin calculator is "experiencing technical difficulties" right now so I can't enter the positions to check, but I'm curious if anyone knows the PM margin requirements for these 2 pairs of trades:
(1) covered call
long 100 shares of a $100 stock
short 1 near month call on same stock with strike 100
(2) diagonal spread
long 1 Jan 2011 call with strike of 100 (for stock at 100)
short 1 near month call on same stock with strike 100
I believe the Reg T margin for (1) will be higher than (2), which is why people are attracted to using LEAPs. But I'm not sure the PM margin requirement is materially different in the above 2 examples. Does anyone with PM experience know?
Thanks,
MikeS
Re: [ConservativeOptionStrategies] Re: DLS questions - note Newbies on this site
Dr. Joe, Can you publish your trading plans for short puts with covered calls for us? Thanks, BobW --- On Mon, 11/30/09, joe & leigh <gass20@aol.com> wrote:
|
Re: [ConservativeOptionStrategies] Re: Let's Get the Site Active Again !!
From: bill ulivieri <uliv2003@yahoo.
To: ConservativeOptionS
Sent: Mon, November 30, 2009 2:35:19 PM
Subject: Re: [ConservativeOption
If anyone wants to become a registered member at www.oldschooloption s.com I would be happy to extend the free website access of my covered call option analysis and ideas. There are a LOT of ways to skin a cat, and there anre many diffferent ways to analyze options. I'm not saying my way is the best by any means. It just works really well for me. The site combines technical analysis, relative strength, risk management philosophies and of course, the "best of the best" covered call writes, IMHO. Regards, Bill --- On Mon, 11/30/09, joe & leigh <gass20@aol.com> wrote:
|
RE: [TheOptionClub.com] GOOG [was Re: Basic Calendar Question]
This captures things (I think). But it's really much more basic.
At any point in the life of an option, that option has some equivalent delta
value. As you approach expiration the delta value approaches either zero
(otm) or 100 (itm). Traders choose to hedge or not hedge to some degree at
any point but at expiration the impetuous is to hedge completely as time
goes to zero. If the position has 100 long deltas, you sell 100 delta units.
if it is short 100 deltas, you buy 100 delta units. If the position has no
deltas, then any new delta exposure is pure risk absorption or speculation.
-----Original Message-----
From: OptionClub@yahoogro
Behalf Of Ricky Jimenez
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 12:05 PM
To: OptionClub@yahoogro
Subject: Re: [TheOptionClub.
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:00:26 -0500, I wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:01:05 -0600, "Jack" <jack@jackcpa.
>
>>I understand it the underlying is up a quarter and you short it, you do
not have any risk. If it goes up, you exercise, if it drops, you buy and
close.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Now, if it is down a quarter (you still own 100 calls but have no position
in the stock), if you buy the stock ($775,000) you have no protection. If
it continues to drop, you are long stock and long calls. All this risk to
make $2,500?
>
>I hope both you and Michael will forgive me if I butt in here and try
>to explicitly specify the algorithm in question.
>
>1. If you have N long option contracts (underlying multiple = 100)
>ITM by M, sell 100*N shares of the underlying if they are calls, buy
>100*N shares if they are puts. You forego further gains if the
>underlying gets further in the money but lock in a payoff of M per
>share. If you own N straddles, you can do this if either side is ITM
>by M. Goto 2.
>
>2.a. If the options now are OTM and there is very little time before
>expiration (probably broker and hardware dependent), remove the
>position in the underlying. If you own N straddles, this step can be
>ignored, assuming one side will be exercised.
>
>2.b.. If there is sufficient time before expiration and the options
>are OTM by M, remove the position in the underlying. You lock in a
>payoff of 2*M. Then Goto 1. Of course you can choose different Ms
>for steps 1 and 2.
>
>I hope this doesn't lead to more confusion.
The word "payoff" used above is misleading. What I meant was that by
using the scalping algorithm for one iteration, you will have a M or
2*M per share cash credit in your account at expiration. (Note than
when you have a straddle, you start a new iteration when you are in
step 2b of the prior iteration.) The payoff from the position will be
0. The overall profit depends on the prior history before you entered
the algorithm as well as transaction costs.
------------
The goal of TheOptionClub is to provide a forum for members to work together
for the purpose of furthering our individual understanding option trading.
All messages and postings, and any materials circulated are provided for
discussion and educational purposes only. No statement contained in any
materials from TheOptionClub should be considered a recommendation to buy or
sell a security or to provide investment, legal or tax advice. All
investors are encouraged to consult a qualified professional before trading
in any security. Stock and option trading involves risk and is not suitable
for most people. There is no guarantee that any information provided is
accurate and, may in fact, be wrong. It is understood that the participants
in TheOptionClub have varying backgrounds and degrees of experience in
option trading, and that regardless of experience each member is considered
a student. As such, any information distributed through TheOptionClub
should be considered with a critical mind and not relied upon as an
authoritative source.
To unsubscribe from TheOptionClub, send an email to:
OptionClub-unsubscr
To unsubscribe from TheOptionClub, send an email to:
OptionClub-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
RE: [TheOptionClub.com] GOOG [was Re: Basic Calendar Question]
It’s pretty straightforward. You are trading deltas so if you own 100 long calls and the underlying is below the strike near expiration you have in effect zero deltas. if you had not hedged the calls in the first place then therefore there would be no reason to buy stock as a hedge as the stock price declined.
What I’m describing here is the force at work that drives a stock to pin. Generally if there is a large open interest at a strike these options have been delta hedged to a large degree. By that I mean they have been pretty much converted into synthetic straddles (i.e. regardless of whether the options themselves are calls or puts) by expiration. What I described in the simple example is the straight call delta hedge that drives the stock back toward the strike as price rises. The same force is at work on the put side as well.
From: OptionClub@yahoogro
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 6:01 AM
To: OptionClub@yahoogro
Subject: RE: [TheOptionClub.
I understand it the underlying is up a quarter and you short it, you do not have any risk. If it goes up, you exercise, if it drops, you buy and close.
Now, if it is down a quarter (you still own 100 calls but have no position in the stock), if you buy the stock ($775,000) you have no protection. If it continues to drop, you are long stock and long calls. All this risk to make $2,500?
From: OptionClub@yahoogro
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 7:11 PM
To: OptionClub@yahoogro
Subject: RE: [TheOptionClub.
Comments below…
From: OptionClub@yahoogro
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 2:45 PM
To: OptionClub@yahoogro
Subject: RE: [TheOptionClub.
OK, so you’re long 100 calls and the underlying trades up to 80.25. Your calls will be worth .25+. Why not sell the calls instead of selling the stock?
Mc -Because you get the same quarter lock PLUS 100 free puts by shorting the stock against the calls. (for those that can’t see this , a long call plus short stock is synthetically a long put. In the example if the stock continued higher the long call would gain in value equal to the loss in value of the short stock and at expiration the exercise of the long calls would negate the short stock. Conversely that long call plus short stock means that below 80 the calls are worthless but the short stock gains value as the stock goes south. Thus, the synthetic equivalent of the long put.)
If the stock drops to 79.75 and your calls expire worthless, you are short 10,000 shares. What if it gaps up Monday (pin risk – cost me $4,000 one expiration L )
mc- you buy the stock back at 79.75 and lock in another quarter. If you don’t buy it back for some reckless reason (why would you not buy back the short stock you sold for no risk at 80.25 with the stock now trading at 79.75?), you just exercise the long calls. There is absolutely no reason to be exposed to pin risk unless you are stubborn enough not to buy back shorts at expiration – or sell longs if you don’t want to be exercised.
OK, so it drops to 79.75 and you buy shares – where’s your protection? What if it continues to drop, 79.50, 79.25,….
mc- you don’t need protection since you’ve just closed all your risk: sold 10,000 at 80.25 and bought 10,000 at 79.75. (i.e. you’ve just locked in $5000).
I can understand why stocks would close at the strike with the most options – when they had automatic exercise if .25 ITM. What effect has the penny exercise rule had?
mc- this is irrelevant. It’s not the automatic exercise AFTER expiration that drives pin behavior. It’s deltas PRIOR to expiration that professionals (and smart amateurs) are capitalizing on.
From: OptionClub@yahoogro
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 9:09 PM
To: OptionClub@yahoogro
Subject: RE: [TheOptionClub.
For instance if I am long 100 80 strike calls on abcde stock and the underlying trades up to 80.25 with less than an hour or two to expiration, I will sell 10000 shares against those calls to lock in the quarter premium. I now synthetically own 100 long 80 puts. If my selling action (and if there are a lot of other open contracts at the 80 strike, the selling of many others) drives that stock back down to 79.75, guess what, I now buy 10000 shares to scalp another quarter out of the market. Lather, rinse repeat, as the pendulum wobbles back and forth and the scalps get tighter and tighter to the point where I’m scalping 10000 shares for a nickel or ultimately a penny.
To unsubscribe from TheOptionClub, send an email to:
OptionClub-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com