I did some research (sanity check) this morning on the very best long-term systems - including the #1 investment strategy as tracked by AAII (CANSLIM).
IBD 100 index (since 05-May-2003): +127.1%
versus S&P 500: +28%
Note: it had a 58.3% drawdown with the '08-'09 dump.
"According to the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII), since January 1998, market portfolios traded according to CANSLIM principles gained an average of 1,859.3%, versus a gain of 23% in the S&P 500. . ." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN_SLIM
Meanwhile, my CC Strategy since 1998 has gained 3500%.
Compare the results from professional money management company:
CANSLIM PC (Jan-2001-Feb-2010): 215%
versus S&P 500: -4.6%
Note: it had just a 20% drawdown.
This last investment program most closely resembles my CC Fund approach, since it's "portfolio is a long-term growth vehicle that invests in leading growth stocks as the market rises and scales to cash to preserve gains during market declines."North Coast
Compare Returns
-CANSLIM PC- -KC PRO CC Fund- -S&P 500-
2001 12.5% 16% (11.9%)
2002 2.7% 1% (22.1%)
2003 55.5% 120% 28.7%
2004 31.5% 44% 10.9%
2005 13.8% 76% 4.8%
2006 10.1% 34% 15.5%
2007 12.5% 12% 4.9%
2008 (12.3%) 28% (37%)
2009 10.0% (6%) 23.5%
2010 (1.8%) (1.5%) 8%
In conclusion, the above data re-affirms my long-term investment methods remain on point - despite lackluster trailing 9-month results.
A) Risk: my 20% (max) drawdown is in keeping with CANSLIM PC
B) Return: my 1,062% gain bests PC's 215%.
C) Although both systems returns vary substantially from one year to the next, staying the course grows your account exponentially - despite the market's ups and downs.
D) Since Jan-2008 (through the market crash and return from the abyss) my system has significantly out-performed growing 18.5% versus CANSLIM PC's loss of 1.8%.
E) Drawdown: my DD during this period has been significantly muted compared to the drop and rise from PC, which is still off it's highs.
F) 2010: Even though Q1 has seen a supposed market "correction" AND has a YTD 8% gain - both these systems have under-performed.
G) Long-Term Systems: for the long-haul, this approach are still the most profitable for the individual investor.
I'll leave you with a quote from the publisher of IBD who developed the CANSLIM method - the #1 investing strategy, as independently tracked by AAII.
"90% of people in the stock market, professionals and amateurs alike, simply have not done enough homework." William J. O'Neil
IBD 100 index (since 05-May-2003)
versus S&P 500: +28%
Note: it had a 58.3% drawdown with the '08-'09 dump.
"According to the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII), since January 1998, market portfolios traded according to CANSLIM principles gained an average of 1,859.3%, versus a gain of 23% in the S&P 500. . ." http://en.wikipedia
Meanwhile, my CC Strategy since 1998 has gained 3500%.
Compare the results from professional money management company:
CANSLIM PC (Jan-2001-Feb-
versus S&P 500: -4.6%
Note: it had just a 20% drawdown.
This last investment program most closely resembles my CC Fund approach, since it's "portfolio is a long-term growth vehicle that invests in leading growth stocks as the market rises and scales to cash to preserve gains during market declines."North Coast
Compare Returns
-CANSLIM PC- -KC PRO CC Fund- -S&P 500-
2001 12.5% 16% (11.9%)
2002 2.7% 1% (22.1%)
2003 55.5% 120% 28.7%
2004 31.5% 44% 10.9%
2005 13.8% 76% 4.8%
2006 10.1% 34% 15.5%
2007 12.5% 12% 4.9%
2008 (12.3%) 28% (37%)
2009 10.0% (6%) 23.5%
2010 (1.8%) (1.5%) 8%
In conclusion, the above data re-affirms my long-term investment methods remain on point - despite lackluster trailing 9-month results.
A) Risk: my 20% (max) drawdown is in keeping with CANSLIM PC
B) Return: my 1,062% gain bests PC's 215%.
C) Although both systems returns vary substantially from one year to the next, staying the course grows your account exponentially - despite the market's ups and downs.
D) Since Jan-2008 (through the market crash and return from the abyss) my system has significantly out-performed growing 18.5% versus CANSLIM PC's loss of 1.8%.
E) Drawdown: my DD during this period has been significantly muted compared to the drop and rise from PC, which is still off it's highs.
F) 2010: Even though Q1 has seen a supposed market "correction" AND has a YTD 8% gain - both these systems have under-performed.
G) Long-Term Systems: for the long-haul, this approach are still the most profitable for the individual investor.
I'll leave you with a quote from the publisher of IBD who developed the CANSLIM method - the #1 investing strategy, as independently tracked by AAII.
"90% of people in the stock market, professionals and amateurs alike, simply have not done enough homework." William J. O'Neil
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment