Ricky .. the point of a simple example is to provide some form of conceptual framework that you can use to develop an understanding of more complex trades ... it acts as a playbook that you can refer to at different stages of trade evolution .... in this case as you approach expiry you are trying to convert a wingspread into a strangle ... knowing this you can make the adjustment in whichever way you want to achieve the end result ... then when you know what adjustment you want to make, you can consider if there is a more efficient way of achieving this, say by using fewer contracts ... much of this knowledge comes from a combination of trading experience, a deep understanding of your trade [position dissection] and a knowledege of synthetic alternatives .... how you getting on with Cottle's book?
Cheers
James
> >
> I understand the simple example you are giving, James, but I don't
> find it helpful in understanding how Michael chose the particular way
> he converted the zigzag position to a strangle. As you pointed out
> previously, the task can be done with 4 contracts instead of the 14
> Michael used.
>
To unsubscribe from TheOptionClub, send an email to:
OptionClub-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
ReplyDeleteHey, thanks for the information. your posts are informative and useful.
Federal Bank